The
simple response to such a question is why on earth wouldn’t I be?
Anyone who thinks the fight for equal opportunities and treatment
ended when parliament decreed that women were capable of
participating in the democratic process, is either wilfully ignorant
or dangerously naïve.
A
lot of people argue that they are equalists, not feminists. I think
they are positing a position that loses any substance the second you
analyse it. If you’re for equal treatment between the sexes, you’re
going to have to advance women’s rights and representation in many
areas, including the cabinet and front page. If you’re for equal
treatment between the sexes, then you’re going to have to make men
do their fair share of child rearing and household chores. If you’re
for equal treatment between the sexes, then you’re going to have to
change the way you speak about, and to, men and women when it comes
to sexual behaviour. If you’re for any of the above things, you’re
a feminist.
You
see, voting isn’t enough. It wasn’t enough for men, it wasn’t
enough for freed slaves and it certainly isn’t enough for women.
The right to vote is a crack in the ceiling, not the sound of glass
falling down around our ears. Participation and representation are
the blows that will enable any group to fully emerge from oppression
and that isn’t achieved with a single piece of very hard won
legislation. It takes time and it usually involves going ten rounds
with people who are terrified of change and the loss of authority. It
takes generations, each using the various tools at their disposal
(protest, political campaigns and office, legislation and now the
internet) to fulfil a promise.
I’m
not suggesting that great strides haven’t been made. I’m
asserting that there are many more to be made in order to have a
truly meritocratic society. And that some of the rights that were
fought for at great cost are under attack by men and women for
reasons that both disturb and escape me. Saying that you want
equality, without acknowledging the necessity for a feminist
movement, when feminism is so clearly one of the routes leading to an
equal society, is ridiculous.
Without
a feminist movement in this country, and across the globe, we will
never see a society that offers each gender a fair shot at the life
they want. I am under no illusion about the fight that we are in for.
Nor do I imagine it will be achieved in my lifetime, but I do hope
that my generation will make that crack in the ceiling big enough for
the next generation to feel a breeze coming through.
I
am feminist because the work isn’t done. And even when society can
say that the genders are equal in their educational, political,
physical, legal and familial treatment, I would still be a feminist
and not an equalist, because being part of a movement that seeks to
improve the lives of billions of women and girls, rather than one
that sits on the fence, is something that I am proud of. Plus
sitting on the fence really isn’t as comfortable as it sounds.
LMC
No comments:
Post a Comment